Monday, October 31, 2005
Sunday, October 30, 2005
Business as Usual
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f16b7/f16b7c8718ea11583c72c60bf909be79bcc088f3" alt=""
Today on the political shows more than one of the uniformly right leaning commentators wondered aloud why Scooter Libby would do such a stupid thing as perjuring himself over such a small matter like the Niger yellowcake. How these highly paid media characters retain their jobs is beyond my comprehension.After all the lies of the Bush Administration and their typical ad hominem attacks, how can they find Libby's lies surprising ? The Press has let them get away with it so many times before, why would anyone in Cheney's office think this would be any different? This is just business as usual, the signature strategy of Karl Rove, passed down from Lee Atwater.Anna Quindlen describes the situation well:
"The investigation of who leaked what to whom, of what the reporter knew and how she knew it, may be about national security and journalistic ethics, but at its base it is about something more important: the Nixonian lengths to which these people will go to shore up a bankrupt policy and destroy those who cross them on it."
Saturday, October 29, 2005
Intelligent Design Revisited
Columbia Journalism Review features a fine study of the way in which the public media handles the notion of Intelligent Design. The authors, Chris Mooney and Matthew C. Nisbet, conclude that the Press and media have elevated the so-called theory of ID to the level of that other theory, Evolution. They point out that although the scientific community rejects ID because it has no sound scientific basis, it is treated by reporters as if it were just an alternate scientific explanation that is part of the consensus.It doesn't help that the President (who some people still respect) states that ID should be taught in Science classes for fairness' sake.
The speculations of Michael Behe in his book, Darwin's Black Box are spread by the major ID agents at The Discovery Institute. Behe claims that a biological observation of the eye shows that there is "irreducible complexity" that would preclude the random development of Evolution. According to him, this level of complexity requires guidance or design. Of course, the mutations of natural selection are not random at all, they are made inevitable by the success of a thriving organism. In any case, Behe's analogy is the mousetrap, which he says will not work at all missing any of its components. Isn't it curious that he uses the mousetrap ? There are many kinds, with different constructions. The ones that don't work so well are extinct - they don't sell.And isn't it obvious that Behe is ignoring more primitive forms of the Eye, like that of a housefly ?
One significant problem with Behe's observation is that he is arguing from ignorance. He uses a post hoc argument to draw a conclusion about the cause of certain complexity in organisms. But he is saying something like this:
"I find it hard to imagine a way in which a thousand-ton piece of metal could fly through the air. Therefore, airplanes will never work."
ID is religious speculation that cannot be proven in a scientific, experimental observable manner. It deals with what Kant (and Schopenhauer)called noumena, whereas Science (like Evolution) deals with phenomena. Please explain, Dr. Behe, how an ID scientist would go about measuring or observing how, where, or when God intervened with Intelligent Design.Don't our children deserve this small measure of rigor in their Science classes ?
Friday, October 28, 2005
Great Lines, Part 3
One of the great lines in the movies is written rather than spoken.In The Shining, Shelly Duvall comes upon the typewritten work her husband Jack Nicholson has been toiling over. In the typewriter is a paper that repeats ad infinitum, "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy." She then examines a ream of paper next to it, a stack of paper that repeats the same phrase throughout all pages. This is a shocking moment, for then she knows that her hubby is absolutely bonkers crazy.Redrum.
Thursday, October 27, 2005
The President's Fall
Emblematic of the President's recent poll numbers: try going to this link. If you hold the mouse button, you can make him do whatever you want.But please be kind, you wouldn't want to make a victim out of him.
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
Monday, October 24, 2005
Mission Accomplished
The year that the President gave up booze was tough one for him. The price of a barrel went from $37 to $9 when Bush was making a go of the oil business.. Another W disaster. Nowadays Bush's efforts are so much better for his fellow oilmen. The price of a barrel of oil hovers around $60. Mission accomplished !
Sunday, October 23, 2005
Fear Factor
In all the buildup to the Iraqnam quagmire, I believe that there is a subtext regarding Democrat support of the war that is not spoken of enough.As Fitzgerald winds up the Plame investigation,the Democrat line is this: the case is extremely important because it emphasizes the lies and mistakes of Bush's administration that led us to war. To which Right Wingers reply - what about all the Democrats that supported the war like Clinton and Kerry ?
Most of the Dems who voted to give the President authority to go to war were and are suffering from a kind of Fear Factor, strongly developed since 9-11. Incumbent Democrats fear reprisals in the way of public opinion if they don't seem totally against even the suggestion of terrorism. This is similar to the means used to pass the "Patriot Act". Though most legislators didn't have the chance to read it, they felt because of the public disposition at the time (Fear Terrorists!!) they had little choice but to vote yes.
This is how government works. A congress person will tack on his/her issue to a budget bill that will surely pass.Bush threatened to veto a recent war spending bill because it contained an anti-torture provision. It was an idle threat because Bush didn't dare have the first bill he vetoed be money for our soldiers.
I'm not trying to excuse Democrats that were naive about Bush's motivations. I much prefer an official like Feingold or Kucinich who actually does what he says. I'm just suggesting that we probably should not expect too many "Profiles in Courage" votes where the incumbents buck the climate of public opinion.Poll numbers indicate that the majority of Americans are waking up to the incompetence in managing this worse than useless, counter productive war, so perhaps this situation will be settled in the voting booth in 2006 and 2008.
Saturday, October 22, 2005
More Favorite Lines
In 1953, after his success in the play and film Streetcar Named Desire, Marlon Brando secured his stardom by playing Johnny Strabler, head of a "motorcycle club." At first the producers wanted to call the film Hot Blood, but thought better of it and settled on The Wild One. Tagline: The "Streetcar" man has a new desire ! The film has another of my favorite lines of dialogue. Johnny,a rebel with/without a cause, is asked,"What are you rebelling against ?" He answers with a question, "Whaddya got ?
Thursday, October 20, 2005
Two Quotes
-- Ann Coulter, Rivera Live
"I think [Whitewater]'s going to prevent the First Lady [Hillary Clinton] from running for Senate."
-- Ann Coulter, Rivera Live
She's really not worth paying much attention to - it seems like she always has to top herself in outrage in every appearance.
Great Lines from Films We Love
When Montoya finally fights the killer, Count Rugen, a slimy villain played by Chris Guest, he repeats these lines again for real. When Montoya holds Rugen up to his sword, the bad guy says he will give him anything. So Montoya says this great line:
Tuesday, October 18, 2005
Quote of the Day
Whether it's Fitzgerald and Rove, or Earle and Delay, you can almost taste the hypocrisy.
Fake Religiosity
James Carroll asserts that Man's most profound understanding of God must embrace the idea that we can't possibly be certain of truly understandable motivation in His works.Otherwise, we would be bound to blame Him for tsunamis, earthquakes, and hurricanes.Carroll says that this admission should guarantee a special kind of modesty or humility,that would preclude religious involvement in censorship,government, and the corridors of power. Anything else is "fake religiosity."
The Trivia Hound
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffb90/ffb90c9812302b1d8fe9f0781ee7057b96115f85" alt=""
Monday, October 17, 2005
Founding Fathers
"It will readily be comprehended, that a man who had himself the sole disposition of offices, would be governed much more by his private inclinations and interests, than when he was bound to submit the propriety of his choice to the discussion and determination of a different and independent body, and that body an entire branch of the legislature. The possibility of rejection would be a strong motive to care in proposing. The danger to his own reputation, and, in the case of an elective magistrate, to his political existence, from betraying a spirit of favoritism, or an unbecoming pursuit of popularity, to the observation of a body whose opinion would have great weight in forming that of the public, could not fail to operate as a barrier to the one and to the other. He would be both ashamed and afraid to bring forward, for the most distinguished or lucrative stations, candidates who had no other merit than that of coming from the same State to which he particularly belonged, or of being in some way or other personally allied to him, or of possessing the necessary insignificance and pliancy to render them the obsequious instruments of his pleasure." -Federalist Papers No. 76
There is a great possibility that Harriet Miers will be an obsequious instrument of George Bush's pleasure.
Quote of the Day
This may be why the President attempts to equate the Cold War with the GWOT. He says they're the same because they are both long running struggles. He wants to portray Islamic terrorists as if they ran a huge monolithic country like USSR. I believe that the terrorist leaders have no country except for the caves they're hiding in. They're definitely quite different, and anyway, I believe Bush on this about as much as I believe him on anything. Not at all.
Sunday, October 16, 2005
Your Three Movies
This seemed to work for me also. I liked these sort of junky ones : Apache, The Vikings, and King Solomon's Mines. In Apache, I remember the scene where Burt Lancaster is hunted down in the rows of a cornfield, one I re-enacted as a boy in the fields near my home. I was amazingly impressed with Kirk Douglas in The Vikings when he single handedly opens a castle by jumping its moat to the top of the closed drawbridge, thereafter forcing down the heavy door. And I always remembered the Watusi dancers in the Stewart Granger version of King Solomon's Mines.
Do you have films like these in your memory ?
Wednesday, October 12, 2005
Tuesday, October 11, 2005
Self-Parody
Quote of the Day
I wouldn't like TR to think me "base and servile."
Monday, October 10, 2005
Help for the Poor Avoided
Friday, October 07, 2005
Vote for Feingold
He voted against the Iraq War, unlike many who naively believed that Bush told the truth.
He would not approve the so-called "Patriot Act."
He rejected the No Child Left Behind Act which is arbitrarily punitive to schools and students.
He voted against the recent bankruptcy reform bill, which punishes economic victims while it subsidizes the wealthy credit card industry.
And he also rejected the last big energy bill which pays off the oil companies, but does next to nothing to reduce dependency.
He might make a good President, but he would probably create gridlock with all the sellouts we have in Congress.
Thursday, October 06, 2005
Orwellian Birth Control
See the Booman Tribune.