Monday, June 27, 2005
Saturday, June 25, 2005
Why Did We Attack Iraq?
Some commentators, like Michael Kinsley, insist that they knew we were going to war with Iraq at a time the the Preznit said we weren't, that war was "the last resort".They insist that we really knew better than to believe what the Preznit and his men were telling us. In hindsight,to me it was rather obvious, when we were reliably informed that air attacks were being unusually increased and thousands of soldiers were being moved up in aircraft carriers into the Gulf.
The Downing Street Memos have corroborated such observations about an early decision to go to war, as have witnesses inside The White House like Bob Woodward and Paul O'Neill.We have learned that the intelligence really didn't matter one way or the other. The decision to go to war was a fait accompli which exploited honest feelings of patriotism (from both sides of the aisle)for political gain. The general public, including so many journalists, were delirious to think our country was in danger from Saddam Hussein.
Why did we attack Iraq? When all the reasons offered by this adminstration, one by one, cave in, we still wonder, what was really their reason ? To them,war in Afghanistan seemed to be a mandatory requirement that must be dealt with so that we could move on to bigger things. Why couldn't we have put in a larger force specifically to bring Ben Laden to justice ? Surely our pal President Musharraf would understand.The search for Osama Bin Laden was a bipartisan matter that really was in no way foremost among the Bush Regime, at least in terms of their actions.Bush had the audacity to joke about looking for WMDs in front of a jolly, laughing press corps.
After the Memos,it is becoming undeniably clear. Why was attack so inevitable ? All that remains is Political Capital.Being a "war president" has such indisputable rewards. Even with the fairly recent example of Russia waging a quagmire in Afghanistan, insufficient planning was done by Bush's team for the outcomes of the Iraq attack.It is evident that Bush team thought we would get in and get out of Iraq quickly, making the President look like he was fighting terrorists.The only prewar terrorist activity that has been verified is Saddam's payments to suicide bomber's families from Palestine (they all hate the Jews, don't they?).The Preznit seems to value political capital above all else. Witness his summation of the 2004 election. He got what he wanted, and this was the message to him: enough of the voters have approved me over my opponent, so I will continue to do things the way I want, to "spend political capital." This interpretation of events makes Karl Rove's recent comments about liberals all the more base and despicable. Meanwhile, we all suffer and we are less safe by this distraction of a war.
Thursday, June 23, 2005
The War in Iran Has Already Begun
Scott Ritter, former Marine, former U.S. weapons inspector, was right about Iraq: before we attacked , he insisted there were no WMDs. He was immediately attacked by antagonistic media which made bogus claims that he just might be some kind of pedophile.
Now, Ritter is speaking out again,publicizing credible reports that the U.S. has stepped up overflight attacks on Iran with drones and "other sophisticated capabilities".This really sounds like the lead up to the current Iraq War, as we have recently learned from leaked British government memos in which the U.S. tried to soften up Saddam months before the so-called beginning of hostilities.
A Better Comparison, Perhaps
One of the lessons of the whole Dick Durbin Attack (and apology) is that the mention of Nazis or Stalinists seems to be so inflammatory that the Right Wing Noise Machine finds it easier to do their usual misinterpretation, manipulation or outright misquoting of such matters. Right wingnuts treat such considered comments as if they were an entitlement to ignore the true problem by diverting attention from actually being awol or actually being complicit in torture done in the name of our country. Jon Stewart was wise enough to point this out last week; it's a losing proposition to mention Nazism and your opponent in the same speech, whether it's done by Rick Santorum or Robert Byrd.
It's inconceivable that any one could think that Durbin was universally attacking all of our soldiers. For what reason ? He really didn't say that.If one reads what he said, one would certainly think that he was disgusted that it was our soldiers who were observed mistreating prisoners by our FBI agent. He wasn't even reading his own words. Once again,the actual problem, such torture as chaining up prisoners for 24 hours or more, is ignored in order to attack the messenger. In current parlance, this is ignoring the elephant in the room. So many wingnut commentators seem to be saying that the problem was not that this kind of stuff was going on, but that it was publically reported to such places as Al-Jazeera.
Better to stick to 100% American examples of atrocious behavior, like the My Lai Massacre. When Seymour Hersh reported the My Lai story, it was eventually understood that this incident in no way represented all of our soldiers in Viet Nam, but only an aberrant few. Still, the perpetrators needed to be accountable for their transgressions, as are we all. Their actions disgraced every American.
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
A Successful Operation
Our Marines have been successful in Operation Spear, in which about a thousand U.S. and Iraqi soldiers have cleared Karabila, an insurgent base near the Syrian border. Speaking of the insurgents, Captain Thomas Sibley said, "Yeah,in a couple of weeks they'll be back and make up for these losses." This situation repeats what has happened in such places as Fallujah. We don't have enough soldiers or enough solid support from the populace to hold these prizes. Judging by current American opinions of the war, we are not going to be sending larger numbers of our people to hold these hard won cities. This strategy, Rumsfeld's lighter army strategy, is repudiated by the real experiences of our soldiers.
Quote of the Day
Put a Legislator in Your Pocket
Here is an ad placed by Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif, in National Journal's Congress Daily and Hotline regarding the Cunningham abuses and the lack of a functioning Ethics Committee in Congress.
A Plea for Sanity
Monday, June 20, 2005
Alert: No Child Left Undrugged
A Message for Torture Apologists
If it sounds like it's torture, and it looks like torture and feels like torture, then it is torture.
Our country, our journalists and our soldiers should definitely not be torture's enablers, proponents, or excusers.
Beating Up the Good Guys
Reasonable Answers
Friday, June 17, 2005
Questions of Some Urgency
At several sites on the Web, distressing questions are being raised about accounting for our war dead. It is suggested that thousands of our wounded soldiers who are air lifted from Iraq to our German bases die in the hospitals there. But the official count of the dead, 1702, does not include those who die soon after leaving Iraq. This figure is set at five to six thousand all together. This is certainly a claim that should be investigated. Were I a parent, spouse, or child of one of these soldiers, I wouldn't want them ignored just to make the body count look better.
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Well Said
From Dante Zappala, member of Gold Star Families for Peace.
Annals of Absolute Power
Political action is different nowadays.The concentration of power enjoyed by the Republicans has shown us that there is no leeway for bipartisanship or divisiveness.
Although George Bush's presidency was literally resuscitated by patriotic bipartisanship after 9-11, his actions and those of his deputies are amazingly inflexible. After the Democrats rejected just ten of Bush's judicial nominees(which might seem fairly bipartisan), did the President adjust at all ? Did he offer even one different name ? No. Three dropped out for their own advantage, and the Dems got the same seven horrific asshats they had already rejected for their extreme opinions. The Republicans claim they want bipartisanship, but their actions show otherwise.
When several Republican senators actually did participate in a compromise, there was hell to pay on the Right. Activists from the far Right have placed "appeasers" like John McCain on their shit list. Democrats must tune out any silly talk from Republicans about bipartisanship. The extreme conservative movement is in lock step, lined up to fight a war, not to necessarily help America, but simply to win. What they say, and what they tell Democrats they should be doing, is not what the Republicans in government actually do.
This war is fought by exercising their majority power in inconceivable new ways, like Trent Lott's "nuclear option". A battle is won when Delay and his Texas underlings decide to reapportion his state again, though it was so recently done in 2000 under Texas law.The reapportionment forced through pretty much automatically gave George Bush some extra electoral votes he needed in the historically close election of 2004.
This war continues with the treatment afforded public television. Newt Gingrich tried to cut the CPB in his days of power, but failed because general bipartisanship cost him the votes he needed. Today, the House has performed these cuts, so, as the wags say, the Republicans hate Big Bird. When Ken Tomlinson talks about liberal slant on PBS, just who does he mean? There was Bill Moyers, now replaced by less liberal David Brancaccio, and that's all. It's not surprising that Ken Tomlinson wants to make a former head of the Republican National Committee the new head of the CPB.
One of the most disturbing elements of recent discourse is the mealy mouthed "dissociation " of major Democrats like Biden and Edwards from Howard Dean. The Republicans would never do this even about some one as corrupt as Delay. Yet the corporate media is happy to publish quotes from Democrats lukewarm about any remarks from Dean. On Meet the Press on Sunday one of those lop sided conservative panels spent 1/3 of their thirty minutes talking about Howard Dean !
Democrats should have learned by now how to side step such trashing of their party. They do not help their base constituency back home by assuring the loss of future elections. The Republicans have mastered the skill of setting the agenda for discourse- Dems should not willingly play into their hands.
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
Monday, June 13, 2005
Bush and AIDS in Africa
Sunday, June 12, 2005
We All Have Good Memories
Quote of the Day
In 1976 Dick Cheney, then working in the Ford White House, said, "Principle is OK up to a certain point, but principle doesn't do you any good if you lose." He knew even then that the ends justify the means.
Saturday, June 11, 2005
Let's Spend Less on Education
This year, they've come up with a new gambit to spend less on our children. The formula for paying teachers has been cut back because certain counties have "amenities" like nice beaches. They neglect to mention that sometimes 500,000 bikers come to my beach, Daytona, to enjoy those same amenities.Teachers in Volusia, Flagler, and Dade counties better get out the sun block because they're going to the beach, but not to the bank. Today, Circuit Court Judge P. Kevin Davey dismissed a case against this new plan to pay some teachers less by saying, "The bottom line...is the legislature has the authority to make these decisions." Judge Davey felt that the school attorneys didn't show that the schools would be "severely hamstrung" and therefore unable to provide the core courses. This judge apparently doesn't expect much more than this for our kids. Sounds kind of like our legislators doesn't he ?
We already have Florida teachers relocating to Georgia, and it ain't for the beaches: it's for a professional salary.
Scandal Fatigue
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
More and More Unpopular
My Help
New Standards for College Aid
Balm in Gilead
In Poe’s “The Raven”, his miserable narrator, tormented by a mocking black bird/demon cries out, “Is there no balm in Gilead ?” This was the land of the Bible that possessed the metaphorical salve to comfort the suffering Israelites. The poem's speaker feels no relief from the grief over the loss of Lenore, his love. His grim feelings are echoed in a religiously spiritual way in Gilead, a new novel by Marilynne Robinson, written twenty-five years after her first, Housekeeping. Her new novel is pervaded with authentic religious sensibility, expressed in severe but beautifully done prose. Believers and non-believers would do well to read this book to gain understanding of the complexity, value and truth found in the spiritual path.
Her narrator is John Ames, apparently dying of heart disease at the age of seventy-six, who writes an extended letter to his distant seven year old son in an attempt to explain his life and the lives of his family. Ames is a minister, definitely a man of God, as was his grandfather, who lost an eye to the struggles against slavery during the Civil War. Throughout the story, which covers about one hundred years of family history, Ames strongly portrays the spiritual composition, or lack of it, in all those he encounters.
Ames is a Calvinist, as is Robinson, a religious following now generally thought to be too strict and repressive for the modern day. But Ames, although often unyielding, leaves the judgments to his God, and tries be as gentle as he can be. He tries to be forgiving, since he admits he has much to be forgiven for himself. In doing so, the wisdom of his faith is self-evident. Robinson finds in her narrator John Ames a few answers but more questions about spiritual concerns in Gilead, Iowa. This work is so excellent it will undoubtedly be shortlisted for the literary awards of the coming season.
Sunday, June 05, 2005
Goss is Disinvited
Saturday, June 04, 2005
Friday, June 03, 2005
Clinton's Lost Judges
Reading at Risk
Brain Stem Disconnected
Oh, it looks like the right is lining up to blame the genocide on Felt. Ben Stein thinks the same thing as Peggy. He's not so smart; I could have taken him any day on Win Ben Stein's Money. He only knows things old Republicans know.